Progress and the planet’s limits: some lessons for the 21st century from the debate between Godwin and Malthus

Ernest García

Resum

A debate emerged at the end of the 18th century; essentially, the same one we are now discussing regarding the limits of growth. Condorcet (1793–1794) asserted that human improvement would never stop. He ruled out the possibility of the finitude of the planet becoming a barrier with arguments that, in today’s language, refer to hopes that threats are distant in the future and of ecoefficiency, dematerialisation, and postmaterialism. Condorcet invented sustainable development as a side thought! Godwin (1793) supported the idea and added that unending progress would be possible only by abolishing government, property, marriage and their associations in order to liberate the individual, thus creating a world without war, crimes, law courts and government, disease, anguish, melancholy, resentment, death, or sex. It is hardly surprising that this anarchist and individualist paradise on earth is similar to the Christian concept of heaven: the dominance of spirit over matter has been a basic belief of industrial society since its very beginning. Malthus (1798) rose against these dreams, saying that nature represents an insurmountable obstacle to their realisation, that necessity and the “imperious law of nature” restrains every organism, even humans, “within the prescribed bounds”—an idea that earned him Darwin’s praise and the enmity of many social philosophers. Malthus argued that Godwin’s vision of society, although beautiful, was unfortunately based on three errors: (1) that all social ills come from institutions; (2) that eliminating property would give rise to unending wealth; and (3) that equal sharing will always solve material shortages. Even in its literal terms, this debate anticipated a lot of today’s current discussion about sustainable development and degrowth, as well as the ecology–equity relationship.

Paraules clau

progress, limits of growth, Godwin, Malthus..

Text complet:

119-126 (English)

Referències

Avery, J. (1997). Progress, Poverty and Population: Re-reading Condorcet, Godwin and Malthus. London: Frank Cass.

 

Condorcet, N. (1793-1794 [2005]). Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progrès de l’esprit humain. Chicoutimi/Quebec: Les Classiques des Sciences Sociales. [Digital edition by J. M. Tremblay, based on the version reviewed by O. H. Prior, Paris:  J. Vrin, 1970]. Accessed on the 4th of abril 2018 at http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/condorcet/esquisse_tableau_progres_hum/esquisse_tableau_hist.pdf

 

Dangeville, R. (1978). Introduction. In K. Marx, and F. Engels, Critique de Malthus. Chicoutimi/Quebec: Les Classiques des Sciences Sociales. [Digital edition by Claude Ovtcharenko, based on the version reviewed by Roger Dangeville, Paris: Maspero. 1978].  Accessed on the 4th of April 2018 at http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/Engels_Marx/critique_de_malthus/critique_de_malthus.pdf

 

Garcia, E. (2015). Los derechos humanos más allá de los límites al crecimiento. Ambienta, 113, 28-41.

 

Garcia, E. (2016). Translimitación y cambio climático. Pasajes. Revista de pensamiento contemporáneo, 50, 34-49.

 

Godwin, W. (1793). Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and Its Influence on Modern Morals and Happiness. London: G. G. J. and J. Robinson.

 

Godwin, W. (1797). The Enquirer: Reflections on Education, Manners, and Literature. London: G. G. and J. Robinson.

 

Godwin, W. (1801). Thoughts Occasioned By The Perusal Of Dr. Parr’s Spital Sermon, Preached At Christ Church, April 15, 1800: Being A Reply to the Attacks of Dr. Parr, Mr. Mackintosh, the Author of an Essay On Population, and Others. Accessed on the 4th of April 2018 at http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/godwin/thoughtsonpar.html

 

Godwin, W. (1820). Of Population: An Enquiry Concerning the Power of Increase in the Numbers of Mankind, Being an Answer to Mr. Malthus’s Essay on that Subject. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown. Accessed on the 4th of April 2018 at http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/1720

 

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162,1243-1248.

 

Hardin, G. (1974). Living on a lifeboat. BioScience, 24(10), 561-568.

 

Harich, W. (1978). ¿Comunismo sin crecimiento?: Babeuf y el Club de Roma. Barcelona: Materiales.

 

Kropotkin, P. (1887). L’Anarchie dans l’évolution socialiste. Paris: La Révolte.

 

Malthus, T. R. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population, As It Affects the Future Improvement of Society with Remarks on the Speculations of M. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers. London: J. Johnson. Accessed on the 4th of April 2018 at https://ia902701.us.archive.org/14/items/essayonprincipl00malt/essayonprincipl00malt.pdf

 

Malthus, T. R. (1803-1826 [1989]). An Essay on the Principle of Population; or A View of its past and present Effects on Human Happiness; With an Inquiry into our Prospects respecting the future Removal or Mitigation of the Evils which it occasions. London: J. Johnson. [Edition by P. James, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989].

 

Marcuse, H. (1968). El final de la utopía. Barcelona: Ariel.

 

Szuba, M. (2014). Gouverner dans un monde fini: Des limites globales au rationnement individuel, sociologie environnementale du projet britannique de politique de Carte carbone (1996-2010). Doctoral thesis. Université Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris.

 

Townsend, J. (1786 [1817]). A Dissertation on the Poor Laws. London: Ridgways. Accessed on the 4th of April 2018 de: http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=njp.32101058836162;view=1up;seq=26

Enllaços refback

  • No hi ha cap enllaç refback.