Students as customers: a paradigm shift in higher education

Javier Paricio Royo

Resum

Increasingly, higher education students are being considered as customers or clients. But this new way of seeing students implies a substantial change in the traditional notion of the student. The idea of student–customers goes beyond the demand for proper attention to
the student: it is part of an entirely new paradigm in higher education, which also includes other factors, such as the idea of higher education as a competitive market, public reputation as an institutional priority associated with a greater capacity for attracting and satisfying students, study programmes conceived by the students as an important personal and economic investment, curricula designed with a clear professional development orientation, quality systems centred on the value of customer satisfaction, and a new way of understanding educational relationships between students and faculty. This paradigm is the everyday way of thinking in some countries, while in others, such as Spain, it is slowly breaking through only now. This paper analyses this paradigm via an extensive bibliographical review of
the research on the different factors that characterise it and its impact on the quality of the learning processes and the social function of universities.

Paraules clau

higher education, students, quality, learning processes, student–faculty relationships, customer satisfaction.

Text complet:

137-150 (English)

Referències

Alves, H., and Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual Model of Student Satisfaction in Higher Education. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(5), 571-588.

Astin, A. W. (1970). How colleges are rated. Change, 2(1), 11-86.

Astin, A. W. (1977). Four Critical Years. Effects of College on Beliefs, Attitudes, and Knowledge. San Fancisco, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers, Inc.

Ballard, J. D. (2004). Academic standards and grade inflation: easily forgotten structural aspects of the equation. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 84(4), 23.

Bastedo, M. N., and Bowman, N. A. (2010). U.S. News &World Report College Rankings: Modeling Institutional Effects on Organizational Reputation. American Journal of Education, 116(2), 163-183.

Bay, D., and Daniel, H. (2001). The Student Is Not the Customer—An Alternative Perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 11(1), 1-19.

Biggs, J. B., and Tang, C. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, Pa.: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

Binsardi, A., amd Ekwulugo, F. (2003). International marketing of British education: research on the students’ perception and the UK market penetration. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21(5), 318-327.

Boza, A., and Toscano, M. (2012). Motivos, actitudes y estrategias de aprendizaje: aprendizaje motivado en alumnos universitarios. Profesorado. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 16, 125-142.

Brown, R. M., and Mazzarol, T. W. (2009). The importance of institutional image to student satisfaction and loyalty within higher education. Higher Education, 58, 81-95.

Carlson, P. M., and Fleisher, M. S. (2002). Shifting realities in higher education: today’s business model threatens our academic excellence. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(9/10), 1097-1111.

Carretero Díaz, M. A. (2004). La calidad: a la búsqueda de la confianza perdida. Revista Complutense de Educación, 15(2), 521-560.

Centra, J. A. (2003). Will Teachers Receive Higher Student Evaluations by Giving Higher Grades and Less course Work. Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 495-518.

Chan, R. Y. (2016). Understanding the purpose of higher education: Examining the social and economic benefits for completing a college degree. Journal of Education Policy, Planning and Administration, 6(5), 1-40.

Clarke, M. (2002). Some guidelines for academic quality rankings. Higher Education in Europe, 27(4), 443-459.

Clayson, D. E., and Haley, D. A. (1990). Student Evaluations in Marketing: What is Actually being Measured? Journal of Marketing Education, 12(3), 9-17.

Clayson, D. E., and Haley, D. A. (2005). Marketing models in education: students as customers, products, or partners. Marketing Education Review, 15(1), 1-10.

Craig, D. D., and Lombardi, J. V. (2012). Measuring Research Performance. National and International Perspectives. In J. V. Lombardi, E. D. Phillips, C. W. Abbey, and D. D. Craig (ed.), The Top American Research Universities.

Annual Report (p. 3-14). Tempe / Amherst: Center for Measuring University Performance at Arizona State University / University of Massachusetts.

Dale, S., and Krueger, A. (2002). Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college: An application of selection on observables and unobservables. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1491-1527.

Delucchi, M., and Korgen, K. (2002). «We’re the Customer-We Pay the Tuition»: Student Consumerism among Undergraduate Sociology Majors. Teaching Sociology, 30(1), 100-107.

Diamond, N., and Graham, H. D. (2000). How Should We Rate Research Universities? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(4), 20-33.

Dill, D. D. (2003). Allowing the Market to Rule: The Case of the United States. Higher Education Quarterly, 57, 136-157.

Doherty, G. D. (1995). Quality assurance in higher education: a coat of many colours. Engineering Science & Education Journal, 4(6), 249-252.

Douglas, J., Douglas, A., and Barnes, B. (2006). Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university. Quality Assuranc in Education, 14(3), 251-267.

Duque, L. C., and Weeks, J. R. (2010). Towards a model and methodology for assessing student learning outcomes and satisfaction. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(2), 84-105.

Eagle, L., and Brennan, R. (2007). Are students customers? TQM and marketing perspectives. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(1), 44-60.

Elliott, K. M., and Shin, D. (2002). Student Satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197-209.

Eskildsen, J. K., Martensen, A., Grønholdt, L., and Kristensen, K. (1999). Benchmarking student satisfaction in higher education based on the ECSI methodology. Paper presented at the TQM for Higher Education Institutions Conference: Higher Education Institutions and the Issue of Total Quality, 30-31 August, Verona.

Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation. Realizing Value from Corporate Image. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

Fombrun, C. J., and Riel, C. B. M. van (2003). Fame and Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Financial Time Prentice-Hall Books.

Hall, D. (1996). How Useful Is the Concept of Total Quality Management to the University of the 90s? Journal of Further & Higher Education, 20(2), 20-30.

Hall, W. A. (2013). Consumerism and consumer complexity: Implications for university teaching and teaching evaluation. Nurse Education Today, 33, 720-723.

Harvey, L., and Knight, P. T. (1996). Transforming Higher Education. Buckingham / Bristol: The Society for Research into Higher Education / Open University Press.

Helgesen, Ø., and Nesset, E. (2007). Images, Satisfaction and Antecedents: Drivers of Student Loyalty? A Case Study of a Norwegian University College. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(1), 30-59.

Hill, Y., Lomas, L., and MacGregor, J. (2003). Students perceptions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), 15-20.

Houston, D. (2007). TQM and Higher Education: A Critical Systems Perspective on Fitness for Purpose. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), 3-17.

Houston, D. (2008). Rethinking quality and improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(1), 61-79.

Jackson, M. J., Helms, M. M., and Ahmadi, M. (2011). Quality as a gap analysis of college students’ expectations. Quality Assurance in Education, 19(4), 392-412.

James, R., and Coates, H. (2006). The context. Paper presented at the Student engagement. Measuring and enhancing engagement with learning. Symposium held on Monday and Tuesday 27 and 28 March 2006 at the Frederic Wallis House Conference Centre Lower Hutt, New Zeland.

Jennings, J. M., and Angelo, T. (2006). Measuring student engagement in learning: promoting shared responsibility for quality outcomes. A call for leadership. Paper presented at the Student engagement. Measuring and enhancing engagement with learning. Symposium held on Monday and Tuesday 27 and 28 March 2006 at the Frederic Wallis House Conference Centre Lower Hutt, New Zealand.

Jones, G. (2006). «I wish to register a complaint»: the growing complaints culture in higher education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 10(3), 69-73.

Kandiko, C. B., and Mawer, M. (2013). Student expectations and perceptions of higher education. York: Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) / King’s College London.

Kanji, G. K., and Tambi, M. A. (1999). Total quality management in UK higher education institutions. Total Quality Management, 10(1), 129-153.

Kingston, P. W., and Smart, J. C. (1990). The Economic Payoff of Prestigious Colleges. In P. W. Kingston and L. S. Lewis (ed.), The High Status Track: Studies of Elite Schools and Stratification (p. 147-174). New York: State University of New York Press.

Kotler, P., and Fox, K. (1995). Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Kotzé, T. G., and du Plessis, P. J. (2003). Students as «co-producers» of education: a proposed model of student socialization and participation at tertiary institutions. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(4), 186-201.

Kuh, G. D., and Pascarella, E. T. (2004). What Does Institutional Selectivity Tell Us About Educational Quality. Change, 36(5), 52-58.

Litten, L. (1986). Perspectives on pricing. In D. Hossler (ed.), New Directions for Higher Education: No. 53. Managing College Enrollments (p. 15-33). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

López Rupérez, F. (2003). La gestión de Calidad en Educación. Madrid: La Muralla.

Lowe, W. J. (2014, 9/4). Education is worth the investment. The Huffington Post. Accessed on the 23th of June 2017 at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-j-lowe/education-is-worth-the-in_b_5767518.html

Lumina Foundation and Gallup. (2014). What America needs to know about higher education redesign. Washington, D.C.: Lumina Foundation.

Mark, E. (2013). Student satisfaction and the customer focus in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 2-10.

Marsh, H., and Roche, L. (1997). Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1187-1197.

Marsh, H. W. (2001). Distinguishing Between Good (Useful) and Bad Workloads on Students’ Evaluations of Teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 38-103.

Marsh, H. W., and Roche, L. A. (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students’ evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 202-228.

Mayor, C., Seoane, C., Linares, J., Carrillo, J., García Cañete, J., Andradas, C., et al. (2016). Barómetro Universidad- Sciedad 2016. Madrid: Consejo Social de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

McDonough, P. M., Antonio, A. L., and Horvat, E. M. (1997). College Choice as Capital Conversion and Investment: A New Model. Texas: Texas A&M University, Department of Educational Administration.

McDonough, P. M., Antonio, A. L., Walpole, M., and Pérez, L. X. (1998). College Rankings: Democratized College Knowledge for Whom? Research in Higher Education, 39(5), 513-537.

Mehrtens, I. (2016). Students, customers, partners? Accessed on the 27th of October 2016 at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/students-customers-partners-ian-mehrtens

Monks, J., and Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999). The Impact of U.S. News & World Report College Rankings on Admissions Outcomes and Pricing Policies at Selective Private Institutions (NBER Working Paper Series No. 7227). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Montgomery, L., and Canaan, J. (2004). Conceptualizing Higher Education Students as Social Actors in A Globalizing World: A Special Issue. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(6), 739-748.

Munteanu, C., Ceobanu, C., Bobalca, C., and Anton, O. (2010). An analysis of customer satisfaction in a higher education context. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23, 124-140.

New York Times Editors (2010, 3rd January). Are they students? Or «customers»? The student as cash cow. The New York Times. Accessed on the 23th of June 2017 at http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/are-they-students-or-customers/#mark

Noel-Levitz. (n.d.). Student Satisfaction Inventory™ (SSI). Accessed on the 30th of September 2014 at https://www.noellevitz.com/student-retention-solutions/satisfaction-priorities-assessments/student-satisfactioninventory

OIA (Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education) (2015). Annual Report 2015. Berkshire: Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education.

Petruzzellis, L., D’Uggento, A. M., and Romanazzi, S. (2006). Student satisfaction and quality of service in Italian universities. Managing Service Quality, 16(4), 349-364.

Pryor, J. H., Eagan, K., Blake, L. P., Hurtado, S., Berdan, J., and Case, M. H. (2012). The American Freshman: National Norms Fall 2012. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute (HERI) at University of California.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London / New York: Routledge/Falmer.

Ramsden, P. (2008). The Future of Higher Education: Teaching and the Student Experience. London: Higher Education Academy.

Regev, T. (2007). Imperfect Information, Self-Selection and the Market for Higher Education. San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

Rolfe, H. (2002). Students’ demands and expectations in an age of reduced financial support: the perspectives of lecturers in four English universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 171-182.

Sevier, R. A. (1996). Those important things: what every college president needs to know about marketing and student recruiting. College & University, 71(4), 9-16.

Sirvanci, M. (1996). Are Students the True Customers of Higher Education? Quality Progress, 29(10), 99-102.

Stuhmcke, A. (2001). Grievance handling in Australian universities: the case of the university ombudsman and the dean of students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23(2), 181-189.

Suriá, R., Villegas, E., Rosser, A. and Rebollo, J. (2012). Motivación y expectativas de los estudiantes universitarios sobre su carrera universitaria. Presentation give at the X Jornadas de Redes de Investigación en Docencia

Universitaria: La participación y el compromiso de la comunidad universitaria, Alicante.

Trout, P. A. (1997). Disengaged Students and the Decline of Academic Standards. Academic Questions, 10, 46-56.

Volkwein, J. F., and Sweitzer, K. V. (2006). Institutional Prestige and Reputation among Research Universities and Liberal Arts Colleges. Research in Higher Education, 47(2), 129-148.

Wiers-Jenssen, J., Stensaker, B., and Grøgaard, J. B. (2002). Student Satisfaction: Towards an empirical deconstruction of the concept. Quality in Higher Education, 8(2), 183-195.

Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., and Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering Quality Service. Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. Nueva York: The Free Press.

Enllaços refback

  • No hi ha cap enllaç refback.